Introduction
The weak point in many strata budgets isn't poor intention. It's outdated planning. From 1 April 2026, under the Strata Schemes Legislation Amendment Act 2025, schemes preparing, reviewing, or replacing a 10-year capital works fund plan must use the mandatory standard form set out in Section 80 of the Strata Schemes Management Act 2015. Remedial works can no longer sit in the background as vague "future repairs."
One detail matters most: broad items like "General Repairs" used to cover pumps, waterproofing and cladding in one bucket. The new form requires tracking by specific asset, timing and cost. If your committee is already discussing a remedial builder in Sydney, this makes one thing obvious: budgets need documented conditions, not guesswork. Here's how that conversation might unfold in a real meeting.
Scene 1: The Budget Meeting Starts
The committee gathers for its quarterly meeting. The agenda looks ordinary until the strata manager raises the key issue: the plan is due for review this year, and since that falls after 1 April 2026, it needs the standard form. A few owners assumed the plan could just be carried forward. The chairperson asks, "Does this change what we need to spend?" Not automatically, but it changes how thoroughly repairs must be documented, down to individual assets rather than broad categories.
Scene 2: The Engineer Presents the Report
The engineer's report doesn't exaggerate the building's condition, but flags several items: early balcony membrane failure, minor concrete cracking and rust staining, blocked roof drainage, ageing façade sealants, and recurring fire compliance certification. None should cause panic, but each belongs in a realistic, asset-level forecast.
Scene 3: The Committee Debates
"Can we delay the balcony works another year?" the chairperson asks. "Possibly," the treasurer replies, "but if leaks spread, we'll need a larger programme later." One owner suggests repairing only the worst balconies now; the engineer notes that may work, but proper investigation is needed first. Another asks about a special levy. The strata manager clarifies that the plan exists to forecast costs early so contributions spread sensibly. A good plan doesn't force unnecessary work; it helps decide what's urgent, staged, or just monitored.
Scene 4: The Treasurer Explains the Reserve
"A capital works fund is not spare money," the treasurer says. "It's set aside for predictable obligations." Remedial repairs look expensive because committees react once damage is visible. Earlier, asset-level planning spreads the load: inspections catch defects early, waterproofing protects the structure, concrete remediation stops corrosion, façade maintenance reduces weather risk, and a contingency allowance covers what's uncovered once work starts. Owners corporations must now also factor in sustainability infrastructure costs, like solar panels, an obligation many older plans never accounted for. The treasurer recommends an annual review despite the five-year legal minimum, since costs shift faster than that. For committees speaking with a remedial builder in Sydney, a current condition assessment helps align the numbers with what the building actually needs.
Scene 5: The Decision
The committee narrows it to three options: repair now, for active or spreading defects like recurring leaks or concrete spalling; delay and monitor, for minor, stable defects with monitoring actually scheduled; or increase contributions gradually, building the fund ahead of larger future works. The committee doesn't need to approve every repair immediately, but it does need to stop pretending known defects don't exist, since failing to plan adequately can now count as evidence of dysfunction, potentially triggering NCAT appointment of a compulsory managing agent.
Lessons Learned
By the end of the meeting, five things are clear: the 2026 changes push for consistent, asset-level planning; older plans may understate real costs now that broad categories aren't acceptable; remedial work should be staged intelligently, not rushed or ignored; decisions should be backed by inspection reports, not guesswork; and the budget should protect the building's future, not just this year's levy.
Getting the Budget Right
Before finalising the next budget, confirm the plan reflects the building's actual condition at asset level, that repairs are costed individually rather than bundled, that sustainability infrastructure is accounted for, and that owners have been clearly informed of upcoming priorities. If your committee is unsure how to prioritise, speaking with a remedial builder in Sydney can clarify what needs immediate attention versus what can be staged. JD Refurb Construction works with strata and commercial properties across Sydney, helping committees plan and deliver remedial works with practical, long-term outcomes.
Get a Quote - request a transparent, itemised waterproofing quote from JD Refurb Construction.
Frequently Asked Questions
- What changed for NSW capital works fund plans in 2026? Plans must now follow the standard format and record costs against specific building assets instead of broad categories. Existing plans do not need replacement unless they are due for review.
- Does every scheme need to update its plan immediately? No. Existing plans remain valid until their next scheduled review, which must occur at least once every five years.
- Why does this matter for remedial building budgets? The changes encourage asset-level planning for major repair requirements such as waterproofing, concrete repairs, roofing and façade works instead of unclear general allowances.
- Should committees increase levies because of the new rules? Not automatically. Levy decisions should be based on the building’s actual condition, repair requirements and long-term financial forecasts rather than the administrative changes alone.
- What happens if a committee ignores the new requirements? Ongoing underfunding may be considered evidence of poor financial management and could potentially result in NCAT appointing a compulsory managing agent.
- When should a remedial contractor be involved? A specialist remedial contractor should be engaged as soon as signs of water ingress, concrete deterioration or recurring defects appear to prevent further damage and address the underlying cause.
Contact Us